User talk:Dorothy Nightingale

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Could you please protect these pages from creation?

Summary by Dorothy Nightingale


FatBurn0000 (talkcontribs)
Maxkatzur (talkcontribs)

Reasons of prohibition?

Dorothy Nightingale (talkcontribs)

We already got rid of the Wikis, FANDOM is the only exception right now as it is the most well-known out of all of these. Things like SJWiki would just make the wiki political for now.

FatBurn0000 (talkcontribs)

You mean why they were deleted, why they were forbidden or why they should be protected? I already stated that they should be protected because they're forbidden, and forbidden pages are better off protected from creation so no users can break the rules. If you mean why they were deleted and forbidden, it was because they were more of the pages that were only there because of the userbase.

FatBurn0000 (talkcontribs)

@Dorothy Nightingale In case you're wondering why I still responded to their message despite your response, I was already writing the message but as soon as I saved it, I realised that you had beat me to it but it was too late to not respond.

Opposition to the deletion of Quora

Atomicstar (talkcontribs)

I oppose the deletion of Quora because there are several reasons that aren't related to userbase.

For example, they require users to sign in to view other questions linked locally, require users to use their real name, removed question details, prevents web archival services from crawling its site, etc.

Dorothy Nightingale (talkcontribs)

That's just like half, and using real names is something Facebook also does as well.

Taking out the joke questions, toxic fandoms, many of these pointers are neutral in question. We'll have to revamp the page, and there are chances some pages might end up having more good qualities than bad qualities, which is something we have to avoid.

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

At the very least it would make sense to move it to an interested sandbox so it has the *chance* to improve. And if the result is more good pointers, perhaps that is reason to give it a candidacy for the other side if people don't have enough to complain about and the simple fact remains of its invaluable usage to people in quick searches.

BookFandumb1 (talkcontribs)

Can you confirm me?

Is disrespecting the deceased page still allowed?

Maxkatzur (talkcontribs)

You deleted it just because it was just another toxic fandom page.

If the page about DOANYTHINGYOUWANT Wiki got removed for being closed then why does this wiki also allow closed websites

FridayMan (talkcontribs)


Dorothy Nightingale (talkcontribs)

It was a FANDOM hosted wiki, not a independent site like MegaUpload, or big service like Google+. I clicked on the link, only to find that the wiki was already taken down.

We've also had to purge reception wikis out of this site due to Miraheze stewards taking down Atrocious YouTubers and even Toxic Hatedoms.

FridayMan (talkcontribs)


There are no older topics