User:CarlFilip19/sandbox/archive

This is where I archive information from my sandboxes at Atrocious YouTubers Wiki and Toxic Fandoms & Hatedoms Wiki. If it was okay, I could also edit these.

=Section: Fandoms and Hatedoms=

=Draft: Fanboys and Fangirls (Toxic Portion)= Fanboys are fangirls are boys and girls (respectively) who are fans, hence the name. They both have a poor reputation for these reasons.

Redeeming Qualities
=Draft: Meme Fandom and Hatedom=

'''NOTE: Yes. I know the fandom side may not be allowed, but I am trying to make an improvement of the previous page with better criticism while avoiding actually anti-meme reasons. I also want actual criticism on this page instead of you flat-out deleting this information. Besides, it has the hatedom, which you have talked about for some time yet no page about it came out, so that is another reason not to remove all of this.'''

Also called “The Meme Community and The Anti-Meme Community”. By definition, a meme is non-physical information that spreads like a gene, adapting and developing as a new instance with it gets created. Here, a meme is simply a joke that gets changed by means of creativity and adaptation to a situation. While the fandom is rough, the hatedom is also an issue.

Both

 * 1) They both can get overly upset when someone uses a dead meme.

Fandom

 * 1) Some of their humor can be confusing instead of clever, with people simply using strange memes like earrape instead of putting more comedic effort into it (like actually making "anime" (like Cory in the House) look like anime thorugh fanworks instead of just simply calling it anime).
 * 2) They can also be too careless (if not, mean-spirited):
 * 3) *There are spoiler memes that ruin people's experiences by revealing major plot points in anticipated media.
 * 4) *There are also memes that treat touchy things like suicide and terrorism like they're "egal" deals, as you could get in trouble for offending people, even if you didn't mean to do it.
 * 5) *One thing. Hate memes. They're so bad that they're the only memes that this wiki is condemning for now.
 * 6) There is a thing called "meme spamming", which can be ignored if it's done in a limited environment, but it's understandably annoying when it's spammed like the spammer is obsessed or something. It's also like repating the same joke over again (image how dull that can get).
 * 7) *Internet trolls are examples of people who spam memes in said toxic way.
 * 8) Some even steal memes, which is plagiarism.

Hatedom

 * 1) They can look hypocritical since they hate memes yet some like running gags in comedy and even find some meme-spawning scenes funny, and memes are like those jokes.
 * 2) They may have petty reasons to hate memes. While not so common, some hate memes because they exist.
 * 3) Their arguments are sometimes one-sided and they sometimes don't even consider how a certain meme could be funny, when that is subjective since not everyone has the same sense of humor. It gets worse then this is done on harmless memes.
 * 4) Article 17 . It's poorly-executed and is said to have been used for anti-meme purposes. Thankfully, the European Union is actually fine with memes.

Both

 * 1) They can have some good points about certain memes.

Fandom

 * 1) Don't get us wrong. There are still many good memes out there. Golden Memes Wiki has pages about some of them.
 * 2) *While the offensive memes aren't great in general, some are clever and can be chuckle-worthy to those who aren't easily offended.
 * 3) It often happens that the funny memes get more popular than the unfunny ones, though some funny ones may get attacked because they aren't relevant anymore which is a dumb reason to dislike it.

Hatedom

 * 1) They were okay in the 2000's back when most of them simply weren't interested in memes and were a bit rare to find, as most people liked memes. Though it would be nice if we could respect opinions on "meme dislikers".

=Section: YouTube Stuff=

=Draft: The Game Theorists=

Adopted from Inkster. The Game Theorists is a gaming channel, run by MatPat, that focuses on theories pertaining to video games such as Super Mario, The Legend of Zelda, and Five Nights at Freddy's. The channel currently has almost 11,793,000 subscribers.

Game Theory: MatPat EXPOSED!

 * 1) The very first problem; he clickbaits to the extreme that it's on par with Ali-A. The thumbnails of most of, if not all, his videos tend to have rather cheesy, bizarre, and clickbait-esque thumbnails of the characters from the game being discussed making unusual faces, and some of the thumbnails also include violent content, such as bloody fingerprints on a steel structure that Glitchtrap was under for a FNAF theory, characters with (bloodless) exposed brains, and even an eyeless Natsuki carrying the decapitated head of Yuri on a plate for a GTLive video, leading to his thumbnails being marked as unsuitable. And the video titles aren't safe from utilizing clickbait, either, as they often use RANDOM capitalization to grab YOUR ATTENTION.
 * 2) He milks popular games so hard that the cow dies from it.
 * 3) The whole amount of channels they have are mostly notable to their hatred to some characters such as Mickey Mouse or Mario as they tend to make theories in attempts to defame them.
 * 4) Many of his theories make no sense at all. For example, he called Dr. Light the true villain of the Mega Man series because he made the first Robot Masters.
 * 5) He tries to say it's just a theory, but he takes it seriously.

The Only Redeeming Quality

 * 1) His videos are well edited, despite the actual content in the video not being good.

=Draft: Racist Mario=

'''Yes. I know that you may not like the idea of me suggesting this, but I am trying to have good points and criticism about this video, so I want actual criticism on this instead of someone flat-out removing this. Besides, it is an improvement of the previous page.'''

Racist Mario is a video by Flashgitz. At a Mario Kart race, Mario becomes an extreme, tired racist who decides to kill any third-party characters around him, including Donkey Kong, Yosh and Sonic the Hedgehog. Then he starts seeing characters of his own franchise as "non-Nintendo", and so he tries to kill them. He then turns big and gets killed by Kratos, who gets the ladies.

'''NOTE: Do not add that "Mario said the n-word!" (though he said "n***a") as a bad quality since it fits his racist personality.'''

Bad Qualities

 * 1) The idea of Mario being a racist jerk may already be strange, but it doesn't have to be about him going on a killing spree out of racism. It could just simply be him being a racist and that's it.
 * 2) The violence is unnecessarily grotesque and looks like an edgelord's product than a clever parody. The joke about Mario throwing glass in Yoshi's eyes made no sense.
 * 3) Poor animation that looks janky at times.
 * 4) The fact that Mario unleashes his racism towards third-party characters in a Mario Kart race is weird since why would these characters (like Kratos and Crash Bandicoot) race there? A different location could fit better.
 * 5) *It made no sense to see Mario see characters like Luigi and Peach as "non-Nintendo" since they're clearly in the same franchise and he would know that. Mario is not meant to be racist to them.
 * 6) The thumbnail looks mediocre. In fact, it's an edit from the previous thumbnail that consisted of Peach with censored breasts which is possible clickbait. The reason why it was changed is not out of audience criticism, but because YouTube demonetized the video because of the thumbnail and not because of the content.

Good Qualities

 * 1) It depends on your opinion, but there's satisfaction with Kratos killing Mario at the end since Mario got comeuppance for his actions.
 * 2) The video is not entirely unfunny. Yoshi's scream is suprisingly chuckle-worthy and works well for characters getting harassed (SMG4 used that sound). Mario's line ˝FUCK YOU, KRATOS!˝ is also a bit comedic.