Blog:Breadtube's gotten wind of their article here & a familiar face turns up

So recently, my BreadTube article was picked up by r/three arrows subreddit (For those of you who don't know, Three Arrows is a major figurehead in the breadtube community). Of course, they accuse us of lying about them, but they don't mention any specific instances of mistruth in the article (I mean as much as I hate them, I did try to be even handed with them with my inclusion of the good qualities/redeeming qualities section, & I did do my research on them including using sources that praise the ever-living hell out of them & even updated it with new information I found such as learning that Libertarian Socialist rants is actually the founder of BreadTube & not Hbomberguy as I initially assumed) & even lie a little themselves. For example, the title says we don't mention Dan in this. At first I thought they were talking about Dan Olson (which would have been a mistruth in itself since Olson is mentioned at lest three times), but I realized they're actually talking about Three Arrows himself who I DO mentioned in the list of other breadtubers in the origins & summary section (see here) plus iv'e included videos debunking him in the videos section (I just have't written anything about him because I'm not overly familiar with his work or any of the responses to it). Also one of the commentators says; First off, I didn't include The Progressive Voice in the list, JohnSmirnov did. Second, all three are counted as being part of BreadTube according to RW's page on them. I kinda figured I wasn't just being a left-wing youtuber that made you a breadtuber (a good deal many anti-sjws such as Chris Ray Gun & Shoe0nHead are left-leaning), It was being both a left-wing youtuber & OPPOSED to anti-sjws (& apologizes for SJWs as well). Then there's this comment relating to our article on the New York Times; Well if supporting Mao Zedong doesn't make you a communist, then I don't know what does. But anyway, while I was browsing though the comments, I came across a familiar face; For those of you who don't know, this guy made an account under the name swaglord500 & edited both the [Rational Wiki] article & my breadtube page. In particular, he removed the line "They give credence to the idea that there are more than two genders" claiming; So yeah, naturally I did assume he was an SJW because only SJWs buy into this "there's more than two genders" tumblr crap & his comment on the reddit page only further proves this since he thinks it (& a lot of other things on this site) are "right-wing propaganda". I mean sure, there is a spectrum in which we do get some men who are more feminine, and some women who are more masculine, and there's nothing wrong with that, everyone has a right to be themselves (Within reason) & yes, certain stereotypical male and female behaviours are derived from social indoctronation. However it doesn't disprove the whole "gender is a social construct" thing as most people do act according to their gender. I'm not saying gender decides every aspect of your personality, but it certainly does have a noticeable impact on 99 percent of men and women. It also does not justify creating new genders to fit every individual's quirks. There are, & always will be, two genders & it's not even transphobic to say both that & that gender isn't a social construct. Most real trans people don't accept this BS because they know that it's all tosh & if anything, their existence actually proves there are at least some neurological differences between genders (if there wasn't, they would't suffer from gender dysphoria & wouldn't want to change gender in the first place). I've also yet to see/hear this so-called "scientific evidence" that he & a few others keep banding around that somehow proves that there's more than two genders. Even rationalwiki doesn't offer any actual scientific proof on the subject & mostly uses what some ancient tribes thought of centuries ago as evidence of non-binary genders (which, by the way, is using both the "Appeal To Tradition" & "Appeal To Anicent Wisdom" fallacies. Which they ironically have pages on; https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Appeal_to_tradition, https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Appeal_to_ancient_wisdom ). So no, it's not a "dissenting opinion" to believe that "Gender Is A Social Construct" & "There are more than 2 genders", it's just plain wrong at best & at worst, far-left propaganda & we will not be host to propaganda from either them or the far-right. This wiki is by & large, politically neutral, hence why we have pages critizing both extreme liberals & extreme conservatives & sites that have either a left-wing or right-wing bias (It'd be no different if he tried to push some right wing propaganda on this site like climate change denial or race realism). So I reverted the edits on both breadtube & rationalwiki saying: Now does this look like a rude response to you? I don't think so. Maybe I shouldn't have called him an SJW right away, but like I said, it almost always is SJWs who believe this gender balony. I even sent him links to two videos from Blaire White, an actual transgender person, which debunks this whole nonsense. He then reverted it back to his edit & repiled; Now that seems more along the lines of rudeness to me & he also doesn't provide any verifiable proof of his stance. This also debunks the first part of his story in he claims he imediately went to the moderators after I reverted his edit. What happended after that I'm not entirely sure since I was getting on with my personal life outside the internet. All I know is that the admin Seewater514 had reverted the edits on rationalwiki & had blocked swaglord500 indefinitely (btw, if you're reading this Seewater514, can you tell me what actually happended in regards to you blocking him, I somehow doubt the rest of his of the story).